Institution record
Danske Bank
- Source score
- —
- Warnings
- 0
- Comments
- 0
Licence records
Licences within our coverage (banks and deposit-taking institutions) are listed first. Check each one on the regulator's own register.
| Regulator | Licence no. | Status | Licensed entity | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DKFSA Danish Financial Supervisory Authority | 61126228 | Regulated | Danske Bank A/S | 2020-12-01 | — |
Peer regulatory & risk comparison
Side-by-side supervisory and risk benchmark comparing Danske Bank against peer institutions in our banks and deposit-taking institutions dataset.
| Institution | Primary regulators | Regulated / total | Risk classification | Source score | Warnings |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danske Bank (this record) | DKFSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Nordea | ECBDKFSAFSA+2 | 5 / 5 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Danske Bank | DKFSAFCA | 2 / 2 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Jyske Bank | DKFSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| Sydbank | DKFSA | 1 / 1 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
| MUFG Bank | HKMAMASFRS+4 | 7 / 7 | Risk level not supplied | — | 0 |
Danske Bank: institutional due diligence FAQ
Key supervisory, licensing, and counterparty verification questions generated from the dataset.
What is Danske Bank's regulatory licence status and supervisory authorisation?
In our imported dataset, Danske Bank (legal entity reference: Danske Bank) holds 1 recorded licence entry, of which 1 carries a "regulated" status and 1 are marked regulated or registered: DKFSA (Danish Financial Supervisory Authority) — licence 61126228, status: regulated. Institutional due diligence requires verifying that the exact legal entity on your counterparty agreement matches the licensed entity name and registration number on the official DKFSA public register.
Which of Danske Bank's jurisdictions and licences fall within this site's regulatory coverage?
Danske Bank is registered at Holmens Kanal 2-12, DK-1092 Copenhagen K, Denmark and tracked under our banks and deposit-taking institutions scope based on its institutional service profile (Investment, Insurance, Banking, Financial services) rather than a domestic focus licence. Its 1 recorded licence (DKFSA) should be evaluated for cross-border passporting and local solicitation rules.
What is Danske Bank's institutional risk classification, enforcement exposure, and score profile?
Danske Bank carries a "risk level not supplied" classification in the source dataset (composite numeric scores are not supplied for this record). The record flags 0 regulatory warning or complaint counts. Because these figures reflect imported source fields rather than primary audit findings, compliance teams should review primary enforcement bulletins directly.
What operational due diligence steps apply to Danske Bank's platforms, entity structure, and complaints?
Before allocating capital or executing trades with Danske Bank, institutional and retail allocators should: (1) confirm the domain (not supplied in source) against regulator-approved domains to guard against clone firms; (2) verify whether any of the 0 recorded warning/complaint entries or 0 user comments involve withdrawal restrictions or scope violations; and (3) confirm the dispute-resolution ombudsman tied to DKFSA.
Related institutional research & regulatory analysis
Editorial briefings and compliance research from FinLexicon Wiki relevant to Danske Bank's supervisory scope.
Derivatives Margin & Prudential Regulation
ISDA 2026 SIMM Risk Weights, Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR) Thresholds & VM/IM Collateral Eligibility
ISDA Standard Initial Margin Model (SIMM) refers to a parametric, sensitivity-based methodology calibrated across a 10-day margin period of risk (MPOR) at a 99% confidence interval to calculate regulatory initial margin for non-centrally cleared over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives under BCBS-IOSCO Uncleared Margin Rules (UMR).
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate & FICC Sponsored Repo: Done-With vs. Done-Away Clearing Mechanics
U.S. Treasury Central Clearing Mandate refers to SEC Rule 17ad-22(e)(18) requiring FICC central clearing for eligible Treasury cash trades by December 31, 2026 and repos by June 30, 2027.
Prudential Regulation & Capital Standards
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Statutory Definition, Regulatory Scope & Compliance Deadlines (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing exact rule citations, covered entities
Market Microstructure & Derivatives Taxonomy
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard: Balance-Sheet Netting Mechanics & RWA Capital Weight Calculation (-4.8% Cat I/II CET1 Change Benchmark)
Expanded Risk-Based Approach (ERBA) Basel III Endgame Standard (BASEL-ERBA-2026) stands at -4.8% (Cat I/II CET1 Change) (Source: Federal Reserve / OCC / FDIC, 2026-10-20), governing multilateral netting compression and T